violation while setting translation unit for unique types
(Closes: #1055637)
+
+ -- Paolo Pisati Thu, 09 Nov 2023 11:29:34 +
+
libabigail (2.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version.
diff -Nru
libabigail-2.4/debian/patches/0001-Bug-31045-Don-t-try-setting-translation-unit
Source: libabigail
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
while building the zfs-dkms package in Ubuntu/noble, in the checkabi target,
abidiff core dumps:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/696568269/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.zfs-linux_2.2.0-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz
abigail-2.3 was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-19 15:51:36 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 19 15:51:25 2012
New Revision: 185524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185524
Log:
2012-03-16
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-16 17:15
---
Thanks Jakub.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45691
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-06 11:00
---
Jon is right and recently I removed that old comment from random.h because
indeed was incorrect.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-06 11:22
---
Let's just close it as fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-17 09:36
---
So... shall we close this as fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 13:12
---
Ok, let's close this one as fixed...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 14:00
---
Ok, let's re-open to be safe: please provide as soon as possible to Benjamin
the information he needs...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 12:49
---
As usual, please reduce these beasts...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4,.5 Regression] ICE in|[4.5 Regression] ICE in
|gimple_op
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 10:19
---
c++filt is part of binutils and indeed the PR is about binutils, thus doesn't
belong here. If you have strong reasons to believe GCC is at fault, please
explain and reopen.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 18:47
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16006 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 18:47
---
*** Bug 39243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-06 11:41
---
Done both.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-06 16:39
---
Ok, thanks. Can you summarize the present status, then? Outstanding issues,
maybe more patchlets... ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 12:51
---
If you are looking for a totally unsupported (can go away at any moment)
workaround (it's a bug that it does what you want), see PR11705
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37557 ***
--
paolo
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 12:51
---
*** Bug 42552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 01:21
---
Matthias, please apply your doc patchlet, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
--- Comment #21 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 01:25
---
Done (I'm trusting you blindly)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 02:01
---
Matthias, sorry, please apply only the first hunk, I'm applying momentarily the
patch from Ed fixing the second issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo dot carlini at oracle |
|dot com |
http
--
Bug 41101 depends on bug 41316, which changed state.
Bug 41316 Summary: [C++0x] forward_list::sort violates strict aliasing rules
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41316
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-24 10:42
---
Closing...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-22 14:43
---
Indeed, is correct per the current C++ standard at least. I also remember to
have certainly closed similar issues in the past, but I'm too lazy to find one
to mark as duplicate ;)
--
paolo dot carlini
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-22 20:30
---
Two general comments: 1- Patches should be in any case posted to the
gcc-patches mailing list; 2- I got previous feedbacks from Joseph as meaning
that the issue is general, not restricted to the arm config; 3
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-13 18:42
---
To be clear, due to PR40134, the patch mentioned has been reverted for now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40133
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-13 18:42
---
To be clear, due to PR40134, the patch mentioned has been reverted for now.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 09:17
---
Is this related to PR39491?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 09:19
---
Removing 4.2 regression, branch no longer maintained.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 11:02
---
By the way, if you want to hear my advice, remember to regression test on those
much less widespread targets *before* major releases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- You
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 11:25
---
Benjamin, can you have a look?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 13:20
---
Excellent. Then Matthias' suggested fix makes sense to me. Better if Benjamin
could also review it, however (lately, he touched this code, IIRC).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-07 12:23
---
Hi. Definitely, I like the first approach better. Jakub, are you willing to
work on it? Honestly, because I don't think it's the right time to play with
ABI issues, I'm ready to revert completely this piece
--- Comment #30 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-19 17:52
---
Yes, this can be considered fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-4
Severity: normal
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=mapserver;ver=5.0.3-2;arch=hppa;stamp=1215064372
That causes a FTBS on mapserver, one would expect that the flag was
ignored instead for a shared library.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.3-2
Severity: serious
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=grass;ver=6.2.3-2;arch=arm;stamp=1204569437
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/grass-6.2.3/display/d.barscale'
gcc -I/build/buildd/grass-6.2.3/dist.arm-unknown-linux-gnu/include -Wall
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.2-2
Severity: grave
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=qgis;ver=0.8.1-2;arch=arm;stamp=1192513709
/build/buildd/qgis-0.8.1/src/plugins/grass/qgsgrassedit.cpp: At global scope:
/build/buildd/qgis-0.8.1/src/plugins/grass/qgsgrassedit.cpp:1840: internal
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 22:58 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 22:58:32 2007
New Revision: 126096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126096
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 22:59 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 22:59:00 2007
New Revision: 126097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126097
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 23:02 ---
Subject: Bug 32509
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 23:02:05 2007
New Revision: 126098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126098
Log:
2007-06-28 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #27 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 13:37 ---
Subject: Bug 14493
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Feb 1 13:36:51 2007
New Revision: 121461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121461
Log:
2007-02-01 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #28 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 15:56 ---
Subject: Bug 14493
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Feb 1 15:56:37 2007
New Revision: 121465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121465
Log:
2007-02-01 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 12:24 ---
Subject: Bug 14991
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Jan 13 12:24:02 2007
New Revision: 120749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120749
Log:
2007-01-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-13 12:24 ---
Subject: Bug 14991
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Jan 13 12:24:20 2007
New Revision: 120750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120750
Log:
2007-01-13 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 10:11 ---
Subject: Bug 25421
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:11:03 2005
New Revision: 108565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108565
Log:
2005-12-15 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 10:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25421
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:22:19 2005
New Revision: 108566
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108566
Log:
2005-12-15 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 10:23 ---
Subject: Bug 25421
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 15 10:22:53 2005
New Revision: 108567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108567
Log:
2005-12-15 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR libstdc
--- Additional Comments From paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-16 17:29
---
There is currently no way seems to me way (punt intended :) too strong!
What about:
-nostdinc++ -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2 -I/usr/include/c++/3.3.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu
??
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610
paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Could someone comment this issue?
Openmosix is a kernel patch for 2.4.19 we have also in archives.
- Forwarded message from Moshe Bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 11:32:29 +0200
Subject: RE: [Openmosix-devel] Compiling
Synopsis: vectors of vectors break with -ftrapv
State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 27 08:49:32 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. Seems related to libstdc++/1823, which I can also
reproduce with gcc3.2.1 (glibc2.3.1, i686-pc-linux-gnu
55 matches
Mail list logo
