--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:24 ---
Still broken?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29
---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 40506 depends on bug 39959, which changed state.
Bug 39959 Summary: [4.5 Regression] IMA is broken, gcc.dg/pr34668-1.c,
gcc.dg/pr34668-2.c ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39959
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 08:39 ---
Use STAGE1_CFLAGS=-O -g.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37739 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #38 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 08:39
---
*** Bug 44437 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #38 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:11
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:13 ---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12 ---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 14:24
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-20 14:25
---
Subject: Bug 38360
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 20 14:24:39 2010
New Revision: 158561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158561
Log:
2010-04-20 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 08:57 ---
GCC has code to do exactly this. Somebody needs to debug why it doesn't work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:20
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:20
---
GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 10:15
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] very long
compile-time in PRE building gimp-plugin-registry
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, kurt at garloff dot de wrote:
--- Comment #11 from kurt
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 10:07
---
I'm running into this as well, but with code that clearly compiled fine with
gcc 4.4. So maybe it's a slightly different issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42634
--- You are receiving
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You
--
Bug 42698 depends on bug 42739, which changed state.
Bug 42739 Summary: [4.5 Regression] ICE with computed goto, destructors, and
optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42739
What|Old Value |New Value
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||42739
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42698
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 10:14 ---
Reduced testcase from PR42725:
namespace Glib {
class ustring {
public:
typedef unsigned size_type;
ustring(const char* src, size_type n);
ustring(const char* src
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-14 15:43 ---
The patch for PR42739 also fixes this bug. Thus, duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42739 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42676
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42706
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42713
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42715
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42715
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42713
--- You
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 11:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=19568)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19568action=view)
somewhat reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42715
--- You are receiving
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 13:42 ---
Confirmed. 4.4 accepts the code, reducing based on that.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5 regression] jc1: ICE in|[4.5 Regression] jc1: ICE in
|redirect_eh_edge_1
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 13:43 ---
You can use -fpermissive in which case it's no longer error-recovery.
The emitted warning doesn't vanish with -w, the note stays:
./cc1plus -quiet greg_month.ii -m32 -fpermissive -w
In file included from ./boost
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:13 ---
Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=19549)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19549action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42701
--- You are receiving this mail
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 14:38 ---
__extension__ typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t;
typedef uint64_t ScmUInt64;
void swapb64(ScmUInt64 *loc)
{
union {
ScmUInt64 l;
unsigned char c[4];
} dd;
unsigned char t;
dd.l
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.4.1 4.5.0 |4.4.1
Known to work|4.3.4 |4.3.4 4.5.0
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=19556)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19556action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42706
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 15:55 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:08 ---
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
extern char *yytext;
typedef union YYSTYPE {
char *id;
} YYSTYPE;
extern YYSTYPE yylval;
void yylex (int b)
{
yylval = (YYSTYPE) (b ? 0 : (char *) malloc (4));
}
#1
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:30 ---
Also works without -g. Reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=19561)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19561action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:40 ---
Seems to work on current trunk (fixed between revs 155679 (failing) and
155834 (ok)).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42710
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 16:43 ---
Looks like PR42704 which is what I reproduce with the testcase in this
bug as well. I guess you built 4.5 w/o checking.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42704 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42676
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 14:44
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- You
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |rtl-optimization
Keywords
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 13:53 ---
So, which stages do ICE on the testcase?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42511
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 15:36
---
Well, I can't see how this wouldn't be a problem on other targets thus I
re-iterate: which stages do show this behavior? Does the stage1 cc1
reproduce it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42511
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||42146
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42611
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 15:19 ---
Works on i?86-linux. I guess stage2 is miscompiled?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42511
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41684
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41621
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-14 21:30 ---
Note that these errors only happen if you build GCC with checking enabled
which is not the default for released compilers.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 11:14 ---
Indirectly including a PCH is invalid.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-16 11:56
---
Subject: Bug 41101
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 16 11:56:31 2009
New Revision: 151744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151744
Log:
2009-09-16 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
--- Comment #27 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-16 11:57
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41327
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||41316
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 15:05
---
Fixed on trunk. Let's wait a bit to watch for fallout before backporting it.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 10:01
---
Created an attachment (id=18526)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18526action=view)
preprocessed libstdc++ testcase (32bit)
Testcase that fails at -O2 with the patch. The 2nd patch bootstraps
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 12:38
---
We again have ANTIC_IN/OUT oscillation
ANTIC_OUT[] := { x_2 (0001), y_3 (0002), {pointer_plus_expr,x_2,4} (0011) }
ANTIC_IN[] := { x_2 (0001), y_3 (0002), {pointer_plus_expr,x_2,4} (0011) }
ANTIC_OUT[] := { x_2
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 12:41
---
This is what I am thinking of:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c (revision 151458)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c (working copy
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 12:50
---
Equivalent to that would be to clean ANTIC_IN using the maximal set - that is,
do not allow expressions in ANTIC_IN that are not in the maximal set.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 17:41
---
Do you mean sth like the following? Simply assuming that the maximal-set is
all ones and obviously translating all ones also results in all ones.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 17:48
---
Err... I wonder how this works at all ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 17:53
---
Ah, we start from the exit block with ANTIC_IN {} and go to its predecessors
getting just EXP_GEN - TMP_GEN there. Not unsound.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
--- You are receiving
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 19:51
---
Both patches bootstrap regtest ok apart from
FAIL: 23_containers/forward_list/operations/6.cc execution test
hmm.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 17:50 ---
*** Bug 41263 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 17:51 ---
Testcase from PR41263:
int func(int);
int bug(int* x, int* y, int N)
{
int i;
int* t;
while (1)
{
for (i=1; i=N; i++)
{
y[i] = func(x[i] - x[1]);
if (y[i]) return i;
}
t=x; x=y
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 18:15
---
Testcase with less IL:
int func(int);
void
bug(int* x, int* y, unsigned long int N)
{
unsigned long int i;
int* t;
while (1)
{
for (i=1; i=N; i++)
{
y[i] = func(x[i] - x[1
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 11:21 ---
Instead it likely broke it.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 11:24 ---
Trunk is broken as well at -O -ftree-pre.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||40321
nThis||
http
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 11:47 ---
One reduced testcase, requires both the typedef and the unprototyped foo
(thus, implicit return type int).
typedef long *GEN;
int foo(GEN);
void int_elt_val(GEN nf, GEN x, GEN y, long N, int b)
{
GEN tmp
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 13:18 ---
Other one:
typedef long *GEN;
GEN dvmdii(GEN x);
GEN mulii(GEN x);
void int_elt_val(GEN x, GEN y, long N, int b, long k)
{
long i;
GEN r,a;
while (1)
{
for (i=1; i=N; i
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 09:10 ---
*expr_p = targetm.gimplify_va_arg_expr (valist, type, pre_p, post_p);
SET_EXPR_LOCATION (*expr_p, loc);
is simply bogus. You can't expect *expr_p being still an expression tree
when you throw
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:28 ---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 ---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29 ---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29 ---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
