--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:05 ---
*** Bug 40620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40462
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 20:42 ---
Mine.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
--- Comment #10 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:21 ---
Subject: Bug 40347
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jul 1 23:21:17 2009
New Revision: 149158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149158
Log:
PR bootstrap/40347
* function.c
--- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:33 ---
Tested the fix for sparc; re-open if it's not fixed for darwin too.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-21 20:49 ---
Subject: Bug 37815
Author: rth
Date: Tue Oct 21 20:48:16 2008
New Revision: 141278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141278
Log:
PR 37815
* emit-rtl.c (get_spill_slot_decl): Export
--- Comment #15 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 00:46 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-17 16:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=16513)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16513action=view)
proposed patch
I'm pretty sure this patch is sufficient to return this function to working
order.
I'll have a look
--- Comment #23 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 17:46 ---
Subject: Bug 33410
Author: rth
Date: Thu Feb 7 17:45:24 2008
New Revision: 132171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132171
Log:
PR rtl-opt/33410
* config/alpha/alpha.c
--- Comment #24 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-07 21:59 ---
Subject: Bug 33410
Author: rth
Date: Thu Feb 7 21:58:42 2008
New Revision: 132176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132176
Log:
PR rtl-opt/33410
* config/alpha/alpha.c
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #13 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 17:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=15066)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15066action=view)
proposed fix
There's two things we can do. First, we could modify loop-iv.c to cope with
a CCmode REG_EQUAL note
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33410
--- You
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 02:29 ---
Subject: Bug 28623
Author: rth
Date: Sun Apr 22 02:29:05 2007
New Revision: 124033
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124033
Log:
PR target/28623
* config/alpha/alpha.c
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 02:30 ---
Subject: Bug 28623
Author: rth
Date: Sun Apr 22 02:30:31 2007
New Revision: 124034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124034
Log:
PR target/28623
* config/alpha/alpha.c
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 02:31 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-20 20:36 ---
Subject: Bug 28623
Author: rth
Date: Fri Apr 20 20:35:55 2007
New Revision: 124002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124002
Log:
PR target/28623
* config/alpha/alpha.c
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #48 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-01 19:17 ---
Subject: Bug 31169
Author: rth
Date: Sun Apr 1 19:17:38 2007
New Revision: 123405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123405
Log:
PR tree-optimization/31169
* tree-vrp.c
--- Comment #33 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 17:30 ---
I've been trying to track down this same failure on Alpha. I can reproduce
that
reverting the third hunk allows the bootstrap to complete. Finding what has
got
miscompiled has been very difficult. Only two files
--- Comment #34 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 18:13 ---
Actually, on second thought, I don't think the sign_bit_p change is legit:
Value ranges after VRP:
-mask_lo_1: [0, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0 elements)
+mask_lo_1: [0x0, +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { } (0
--- Comment #35 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 18:21 ---
With some sed help, one can see that fold_binary is completely ruined:
- mhi = 0x0 128 - width;
- if ((~(hi2 | hi1) mhi) == 0) goto L; else goto L;
-
-L:;
- mlo = 0x0;
+ mhi = 0
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 21:39
---
Actually, BACKTRACESPEC does make it into libgcj.spec via substitution.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23602
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02 22:08
---
I'm sure that the patches listed in comments #6 and #7 are bogus.
But we've had problems before with unwinding with -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args
(implied by -mtune=i486, implied by i486-linux), plus -fomit
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-30 02:46
---
That said, I can't get any test to fail when run by hand. libtool compile
and link line pasted out of the log, as well as the associated LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
What am I missing?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
--- You are receiving this mail
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 04:18
---
I believe it to be fixed. Reopen if not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00323.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 09:37
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 00:46
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 07:38
---
You *do* realize that the current problem has absolutely nothing to do with
the original report, don't you? You *do* realize that rewriting a PR like
this is pointless, and you should file a *new* PR to cover
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 08:03
---
I don't replicate it. That is, I don't even get gnat1 built at present.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-26 04:36
---
Yes. It's unfortunate, but hard-coded register numbers get that way.
The correct way to fix this is to use the new c register constraint
and to not use $27 as an explicit asm register. I've had to make
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-27 00:09
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg02198.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-01 20:21
---
patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00076.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-01 21:48
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-01 02:24
---
Mine; testing patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-16 11:32
---
Committed Jan's patch to both mainline and 3.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-09 02:41
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg00628.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
44 matches
Mail list logo
