[Bug c++/35057] Integer variable value lost due to optimizations?

2008-03-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-03 16:34 --- No, we only confirm bugs once they have a reduced testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35057 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are

[Bug c++/35057] Integer variable value lost due to optimizations?

2008-03-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-03 16:37 --- basic_endpoint() : data_() { asio::detail::sockaddr_in4_type data = reinterpret_castasio::detail::sockaddr_in4_type(data_); data.sin_family = 2; data.sin_port = 0; data.sin_addr.s_addr

[Bug c++/35057] Integer variable value lost due to optimizations?

2008-02-05 Thread fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

[Bug c++/35057] Integer variable value lost due to optimizations?

2008-02-03 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
-- Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx |