[Bug c/35489] Inaccurate GCC documentation

2008-03-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-10 00:52 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Actually, I like that response. I might try to use it myself next time one of > our customers reports a problem. I guess that your contracted GCC support developers may give you a reply t

[Bug c/35489] Inaccurate GCC documentation

2008-03-09 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-10 00:37 --- @Adam, If you think that something is wrong in the documentation, please point out exactly which text should be removed and what should be added. Also, feel free to submit a documentation patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/cont

[Bug c/35489] Inaccurate GCC documentation

2008-03-06 Thread adam at irvine dot com
--- Comment #2 from adam at irvine dot com 2008-03-07 00:08 --- (In reply to comment #1) > > but others are > actual bugs in which the compiler is generating incorrect instructions > (such as #12331); > > That is not incorrect instructions. Just different than what you are > expecting.

[Bug c/35489] Inaccurate GCC documentation

2008-03-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-06 23:58 --- > but others are actual bugs in which the compiler is generating incorrect instructions (such as #12331); That is not incorrect instructions. Just different than what you are expecting. All can be defected by the