--- Comment #19 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 04:08 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
>
> I had ONLY HOPEd VOLATILE statement in fortran 77 EXTENSION of gfortran.
> I thought that would be convenient
> on small modification of legacy fortran 77 program.
You've completed miss
--- Comment #18 from sunjoong at gmail dot com 2007-06-21 03:27 ---
I appreciate kargl's comments; they were helpful.
I had known there is VOLATILE attribute in new Fortran standard
but I had worked with "LEGACY" fortran77 program!
I'll write C code if I shuld write one; that is more co
--- Comment #17 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 02:24 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Thank all of you.
> I could understand what make it different.
>
> There is no 'volatile' statement in fortran77 syntax of gfortran.
> Of course, volatile is not fortran77 standard, I thin
--- Comment #16 from sunjoong at gmail dot com 2007-06-20 23:34 ---
Thank all of you.
I could understand what make it different.
There is no 'volatile' statement in fortran77 syntax of gfortran.
Of course, volatile is not fortran77 standard, I think,
but a certian implimentation support
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 08:11
---
So this is just a dup of bug 323 so closing as such.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
5 matches
Mail list logo
