[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2016-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2006-02-14 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
--- Comment #5 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2006-02-14 17:03 --- (In reply to comment #4) Note however, that the true accurate value for d, calculated at infinite precision, is 1-(2^-16). So, the absolute error for gcj is 1+(2^-16) and the absolute error with correct rounding is

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-22 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||vincent at vinc17 dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- You are receiving this

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-22 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-06-22 16:51 --- Confirmed with HEAD. The problem doesn't occur with native compilation, it is a gij issue only. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 20:24 --- Actually this is not a bug unless you use strictfp but IIRC strictfp does nothing to the problem anyways. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- You are receiving this mail