http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #22 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #19)
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #18)
This seems to be fixed in the trunk.
Is there an XPASS for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #23 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net ---
BTW, I suppose that in this test, -Wuninitialized should be changed to
-Wuninitialized -Wmaybe-uninitialized in case it is decided later that
-Wuninitialized no longer enables
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #18 from Vincent Lefèvre vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net ---
This seems to be fixed in the trunk.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #19 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #18)
This seems to be fixed in the trunk.
Is there an XPASS for gcc.dg/uninit-pr19430.c ?
Also, the testcase from bug 42079?
--
You
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #19)
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #18)
This seems to be fixed in the trunk.
Is there an XPASS for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
--- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ ~/test1/205036M/build/gcc/cc1 -O1 -Wuninitialized test.c
-fdump-tree-all-all-lineno
$ cat test.c.139t.uninit1
foo (intD.6 iD.1789)
{
intD.6 jD.1792;
intD.6 _5;
intD.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|burnus at gcc dot gnu.org |
--
Configure
--- Comment #17 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 12:00 ---
*** Bug 42079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 19430 depends on bug 179, which changed state.
Bug 179 Summary: -Wuninitialized missing warning with var
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-20 22:31 ---
All testcases except the one in the original description were actually
duplicates of PR179 and are thusly fixed.
The original testcase deals with PHI ops which is a completely different beast.
I added it XFAILED as
--- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 09:17 ---
This seems to me a duplicate of PR179. I am going to add a dependency to
remember to check this PR when PR179 gets fixed.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-15 15:36 ---
Trying to improve the summary to help spot duplicates.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
13 matches
Mail list logo
