[Bug middle-end/27088] [4.2 regression] Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count

2006-04-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 06:01 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/27088] [4.2 regression] Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count

2006-04-24 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-24 11:34 --- No, I can confirm that this got fixed between 0415 (fails) and 0419 (works). Maybe you want to check in the test case tho? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27088 --- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug middle-end/27088] [4.2 regression] Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count

2006-04-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 01:52 --- I can no longer reproduce this. Does it reproduce for you still? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27088 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching

[Bug middle-end/27088] [4.2 regression] Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count

2006-04-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 23:14 --- in fact when folding 16 / 0 But the 0 has overflowed bit marked so ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27088 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watc

[Bug middle-end/27088] [4.2 regression] Segfault with inlining producing negative shift count

2006-04-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 23:13 --- Confirmed, the ICE is in fold-const. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added