[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-09 Thread jwillemsen at remedy dot nl
-- jwillemsen at remedy dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwillemsen at remedy dot nl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:11 --- Hmm, "regression test" in the last comment should have been "regression hunt". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or ar

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 22:10 --- A regression test identified this patch from Neil on 2003-08-02 as thene start of failures: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-08/msg00093.html -- janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remo

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 13:37 --- *** Bug 24271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug preprocessor/24202] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Segfault with #pragma once

2005-10-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 19:50 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Before that, the failure on mainline started sometime between 2003-07-16 and > 2003-09-15. I can identify the patch if it would be useful to anyone. Hmm, can you because in PR 15167, Neil