--- Comment #28 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 14:37
---
(In reply to comment #25)
Smarter folks than me (iant ;-) suggest that a multi-word rotate will
normally
need all the input bits when setting any of the output bits, so the entire
no-conflict thing doesn't
--- Comment #29 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 22:19 ---
Subject: Bug 23837
Author: steven
Date: Fri Dec 16 22:19:09 2005
New Revision: 108690
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=108690
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/23837
* optabs.c
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|
--- Comment #24 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:09 ---
I think we can blame combine for this bug.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:52 ---
Smarter folks than me (iant ;-) suggest that a multi-word rotate will normally
need all the input bits when setting any of the output bits, so the entire
no-conflict thing doesn't make sense here.
So, let's not do
--- Comment #27 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 06:42 ---
accept while testing a patch...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
6 matches
Mail list logo
