--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 01:28
---
This also effects hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 which means this effects a primary
target.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 11:50 ---
Folks, what's up with this bug? Is it HPPA-only now? Can someone comment on
the status of this bug please?
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 17:32
---
Fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with 4.0.0, 4.0.1 and 4.0.2. However, it
doesn't fail using 3.4.4.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-20 19:06:43 |2005-11-06
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
---
--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 11:21 ---
How do you know this is hppa-linux only now? There's a bit if information
missing about how you got to that conclusion.
Is there some simple way to test this bug on HPPA? (Maybe add a HPPA
maintainer to the CC:
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-10 04:29
---
Only a hppa-linux bug now, which means this should be targetted at 4.2.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-23
12:06 ---
Subject: Bug 23837
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-23 12:05:58
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog optabs.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-09-22
17:37 ---
Subject: RFA: fix PR 23837 (Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Wrong code with
-fschedule-insns)
I have regtested the attached patch on i686-pc-linux-gnu in mainline
from 2005-09-19 18:00 UTC.
2005-09-22 Jorn
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
19:06 ---
Confirmed with gcc version 4.1.0 20050919 (experimental) on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
The i386.md
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
20:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=9783)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9783action=view)
proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-19
19:42 ---
A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19
21:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
If the lreg dump is
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 09:04
---
At least on i?86, this seems to be introduced by reload, .lreg dump is still
sane.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
19:05 ---
Confirmed but works with 4.0.0 20050225.
--
What|Removed |Added
18 matches
Mail list logo
