--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26415
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 21:54 ---
This is a very common error on m68k. We got another bug report, see
http://bugs.debian.org/359281, which says:
torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of
track.s: Assembler messages:
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=11713)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11713action=view)
test case from application torcs
572:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O2 track.cc
...
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=11714)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11714action=view)
test case from application grace
577:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 pars.c
...
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:08 ---
I can provide more testcases on request but I think the general pattern is
clear from these two:
23:00 apinski tbm: what is on the line which the assembler is complaining
about
23:01 tbm fbnlt .L297
23:03 apinski the
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=11715)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11715action=view)
test case from application synfig
This test case is probably also interesting because it shows a slightly
different
--- Comment #8 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-06-20 22:43 ---
The problem with the attached testcases is that gcc is using fbCC instead of
fjCC. The former set of insns is interpreted by GAS as fixed length branches
with 16 bit offset, whereas the latter is handled as variable sized
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:50 ---
But the bootstrap error is a different
problem, since a floating point branch does not have a 8 bit field. Please
move the test cases to a new bug, and instead attach a testcase for the
original problem.
I don't see
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:47
---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:00 ---
Could you submit a preprocessed testcase?
Many of us do not have m68k hardware that can be used for bootstrap.
Thanks,
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
11 matches
Mail list logo
