[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-09 15:56 --- Trying someone else - Eric, any clue about post-increment? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:03 --- Bugzilla wraps the testcase in a way that some commented out is no longer commented out and so you don't see the segfault. Here's the testcase again with proper wrapping: typedef unsigned short u16; typedef unsigned char

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:07 --- Created an attachment (id=14870) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14870action=view) optimized tree dump (4.2) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628 --- You

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:22 --- (In reply to comment #2) I see different IL for 4.2 compared to 4.3, is the bug present in 4.3? Can you attach the optimized tree dump? I also get a segfault with the testcase and 4.3.0 20070916. The original program

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 18:58 --- The final tree IL looks good, so I suspect the RTL loop optimizer gets this wrong. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zadeck at naturalbridge dot |

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 21:23 --- (In reply to comment #7) The final tree IL looks good, so I suspect the RTL loop optimizer gets this wrong. add r1, sp, #56 // upper loop-bound; should have been #12 I actually wanted to say 'should

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tim at buttersideup dot com
-- tim at buttersideup dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tim at buttersideup dot com

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:14 --- Put into WAITING state until the information requested in Comment #2 is available. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2007-12-31 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot |

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2007-12-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |