--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-18 21:48 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 21:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42774
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 18 21:44:32 2010
New Revision: 156024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156024
Log:
PR target/42774
* config/alpha/predicates.md (alig
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 17:46 ---
Subject: Bug 42774
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 18 17:46:17 2010
New Revision: 156017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156017
Log:
PR target/42774
* config/alpha/predicates.md (alig
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 17:04 ---
Subject: Bug 42774
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jan 18 17:04:29 2010
New Revision: 156014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156014
Log:
PR target/42774
* config/alpha/predicates.md (alig
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-18 08:42 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00958.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-01-17 22:32 ---
Uros' proposed fix for 4.4 and 4.3 fixes the ICE on both branches.
The original report stated that 4.3 doesn't ICE. A vanilla 4.3-20100103
definitely ICEs for me on the reduced test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 21:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=19642)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19642&action=view)
Patch for 4.3 and 4.4 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You are receiving thi
--- Comment #7 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-01-17 21:36 ---
Uros' proposed patch fixes the ICE in gcc-4.5. It doesn't apply to 4.4 though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are w
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 20:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=19640)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19640&action=view)
Patch to teach {,un}aligned_memory_operand about unaligned offsets
Mikael, can you please test attached patch on your
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 19:57 ---
Is this related to PR 39954?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-01-17 19:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=19638)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19638&action=view)
reduced test case
I'm attaching a really tiny test case. The trigger appears to be a 2-byte load
from the stack that
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 19:47 ---
Well, gcc would just generate invalid code without this assert.
Reduced test:
--cut here--
typedef unsigned short int uint16_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
typedef uint16_t u16;
typ
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-01-17 19:08 ---
Reproduced with an alpha-unknown-linux cross hosted on i686, built from
gcc-4.4-20100112.
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You ar
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42774
--- You
15 matches
Mail list logo
