--- Comment #22 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:52 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:20
---
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|2.95.3 3.0.4 4.2.0 |2.95.3 3.0.4 4.2.0 4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876
--- Yo
--- Comment #20 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 00:10
---
As the code is deemed valid, we still have a rejects-valid bug on the 4.2
branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:52
---
Subject: Bug 16876
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Aug 25 18:51:57 2006
New Revision: 116424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116424
Log:
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/16876
* c-typeck.
--- Comment #15 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 19:13
---
Created an attachment (id=12130)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12130&action=view)
patch
I think this should do the trick.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876
--- Yo
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 10:44 ---
The failures in 3.4 and later are in fold_const, so the gen_lowpart problem is
now avoided by, well, ICEing earlier :)
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
8 matches
Mail list logo