--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 ---
Subject: Bug 42703
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010
New Revision: 156562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562
Log:
Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4.
2010-02-06 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 15:38 ---
Fixed.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 15:37 ---
Subject: Bug 42703
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 13 15:37:37 2010
New Revision: 155863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155863
Log:
2010-01-13 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimization/427
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 11:07 ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00562.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42703
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 21:05 ---
I would say that the dd.c[4] access into an array that is four chars
long has undefined behavior. It is also the reason why
build_ref_for_offset cannot find a suitable array element for it,
because there is none.
B
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 20:48 ---
This code is undefined because out of bounds access of the array. Also note
the use of the union is not needed here really as char is a character type
which means it can be used to access the ScmUInt64 without any a
6 matches
Mail list logo
