-std=c99, c11, c18 compiles but reports:
"warning: implicit declaration of function ‘popen’; did you mean
‘fopen’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]"
--
RSI (Rick Stanley, Inc.)
(917) 822-7771
www.rsiny.com
Computer Systems Consulting
Linux & Open Source Specialists
Warning incorrectly reported:
"warning: implicit declaration of function ‘popen’; did you mean
‘fopen’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]"
Your message dated Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:39:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#923982: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #879703,
regarding gcc-7: static development libraries miss debug information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89078
Referenced Bugs:
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:43:10 +0200
with message-id <5e97f5d1-d1a4-c1b1-f432-1a883e8bc...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gcc-8-riscv64-linux-gnu: the binaries accidentally contain
debug information which makes them extremely big
has caused the Debian Bug report #894100,
reg
Package: gcc-8-riscv64-linux-gnu
Version: 8-20180321-1cross1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The packages gcc-8-riscv64-linux-gnu, cpp-8-riscv64-linux-gnu and
g++-8-riscv64-linux-gnu has binaries that contain debugging information,
making the binaries very big (gcc-8-riscv64-linux-gnu takes
Package: gcc-7
Version: 7.2.0-11
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
the static libraries, most importantly libstdc++, miss debug informations.
This is not ideal, and the debuginfo should be available for developers
by default.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to pr82215. Submodules should probably also documented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
--
You are receiving
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
Gary Howell gwhowell at ncsu dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gwhowell at ncsu
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:18:22 +
with message-id e1zbmcy-0006gk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#707276: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #561073,
regarding gcc-4.4: gcc -V4.3 -dumpversion doesn't dump version information
to be marked
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:49:21 +0200
with message-id 552ff621.1080...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#53: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#53: gcc: LTO
produces unreproducible debug information
has caused the Debian Bug report #53,
regarding gcc: LTO produces unreproducible
Your message dated Sun, 12 Apr 2015 01:49:39 +
with message-id e1yh71n-0001y6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#78: fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #78,
regarding gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information
to be marked as done.
This means
the Debian Bug report #53,
regarding gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information
to be marked as done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/552851ae
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #53 [src:gcc-4.9] gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information
Bug #78 [src:gcc-4.9] gcc-4.9: LTO makes the build unreproducible
Bug 53 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
--
53: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
tags 53 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Backport for 4.9.x:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=220935
Backport for 4.8.x:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=220938
Versions including the fix: 4.8.5, 4.9.3, 5.0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 53 + fixed-upstream
Bug #53 [src:gcc-4.9] gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
53: http://bugs.debian.org
I have to correct my last statement. It is still necessary to add
-flto-partition=none when using -flto in a package. My earlier statement
came from the wrong understanding of buildid as explained in the gcc bug [3].
A new patch [4] was submitted by Richard Biener. Together these patches
The patches are now upstream [1, 2].
The last test [2] showed that these really seemed to be the culprit of
the problem. In the meantime, Richard Biener proposed patches which can
solve this problem. I've compiled my own version of gcc-4.9 using the
attached patch and can confirm that the LTO
affects 53 + apt-cacher-ng
affects 53 + avian
affects 53 + batctl
affects 53 + batmand
affects 53 + cloop
affects 53 + encfs
affects 53 + exactimage
affects 53 + kwalletcli
affects 53 + makefs
affects 53 + mupen64plus-audio-sdl
affects 53 +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
affects 53 + apt-cacher-ng
Bug #53 [src:gcc-4.9] gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug information
Added indication that 53 affects apt-cacher-ng
affects 53 + avian
Bug #53 [src:gcc-4.9] gcc: LTO produces unreproducible debug
to be only reproducible when not using
link time optimization. This was discussed on the mailing list [1]. Both
Jérémy Bobbio and Richard Biener pointed me in the direction of debug
information which contained artifacts from the randomly generated
temporary files of the LTO builds.
The last test [2
Dear Sir, dear Madam, dear Colleagues,
We are glad to introduce the new book by Olga Zeydina and Bernard Beauzamy:
Probabilistic Information Transfer
A book you will be proud to have for yourself and to show to your friends !
ISBN: 978-2-9521458-6-2, ISSN : 1767-1175. Size 15,3 x 24 cm
Your message dated Sun, 18 May 2014 21:55:00 +
with message-id e1wm92q-0002ki...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#734345: fixed in gcc-4.8 4.8.2-23
has caused the Debian Bug report #734345,
regarding gcc-4.8: imacros command line breaks debugging information
to be marked as done
useful debugging information disappears. Here is a
simple example of that:
imacros-test$ cat somefile.c
#warning some warning
imacros-test$ cat macros.h
#define SOME_MACRO
imacros-test$ gcc -c somefile.c
somefile.c:1:2: warning: #warning some warning [-Wcpp]
#warning some warning
^
imacros-test
What type of artist are you? What do you specialize in? Please let me know a
link to your online gallery where you display your art, I would very much like
to have a look at more of what you have.
Thank you.
Kristos
a
modulename.mod file for each module; modulename is created by
taking the name of the module and, if necessary, converting it to
uppercase. This file contains module information, including any
contained module procedures.
I consider that an example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
What should we do with this PR?
See my comment #1 and #10. I think that the PR
should be closed with WONTFIX (because gcc does not
have
Your message dated Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:48:03 +
with message-id e1slidh-0002ad...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679464: fixed in isl 0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679464,
regarding Missing copyright information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Copyright 2012 Ecole Normale Superieure
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 670578 + moreinfo
Bug #670578 [gcc-4.6] gcc-4.6: [sparc] compiler fails to align stack-allocated
struct,with array of uint32-values to 32-bit boundary
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
This bug is reproducible on amd64 with the following compilers:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.6-4'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
g4 4
TS This is a test
Note that output line 1, g4 outputs as 0, line2 g2 outputs as 0, and line 3
shows the string as NULL.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32
--- Comment #8 from envite at rolamasao dot org 2010-04-05 10:00 ---
I do not care particularly about automake and such, but precisely because the
Fortran standard does not say a word about module files the user expects to get
info about them _for his compiler_ in _his compiler
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-04 08:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
should -c explain how a .mod file is created?
IMHO, the answer is a resounding 'no.' Adding such information
would simply add unneeded clutter to the manual, and should be
an insult
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-04 15:02
---
That idea of a --clean is interesting. I can see where it would be useful to
force a recompile of module files. I am not sure what the actual flag should
be. Of course one could use make to do all of this.
--
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-04 20:28 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #1)
should -c explain how a .mod file is created?
IMHO, the answer is a resounding 'no.' Adding such information
would simply add unneeded clutter
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-02 05:29 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think .mod files are not obvious; the standard does not say anything about
them, though (almost?) all compilers use them. On the other hand, few people
seem to have problems with .mod
--- Comment #3 from envite at rolamasao dot org 2010-03-29 09:31 ---
IMHO there is no need to add this to the -c section of the man page, but I
think it should be added as a section in the gfortran info maual, named Module
Files. There it can be stated how -J and related flags work, and
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 14:16 ---
I think a description does not belong into man gfortran (invoke.texi), but
maybe into the general text of gfortran.texi.
I think .mod files are not obvious; the standard does not say anything about
them, though
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42607
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-4
Severity: important
gcc -V4.3 -dumpversion doesn't print anything. In previous versions
of gcc, gcc -V4.3 -dumpversion would print the version information:
# gcc -V4.3 -dumpversion
4.3.2
It also appears that other options are affected and don't print anything
Your message dated Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:16:18 +
with message-id e1n5ll8-0002aw...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#547989: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.88
has caused the Debian Bug report #547989,
regarding gcc-defaults: Please update package information of sh4
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.87
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@superh.org
Usertags: sh4
Hi,
I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
sh4 can build and use gcj-4.4 and 4.3.
Please update package infomation of sh4.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 506481 gcc
Bug #506481 [initscripts] initscripts: Fix to allow falsified cpu information
in /proc/cpuinfo
Bug reassigned from package 'initscripts' to 'gcc'.
Bug #506481 [gcc] initscripts: Fix to allow falsified cpu information in
/proc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 506481 initscripts
Bug #506481 [gcc] initscripts: Fix to allow falsified cpu information in
/proc/cpuinfo
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc' to 'initscripts'.
Bug #506481 [initscripts] initscripts: Fix to allow falsified cpu information
.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages
Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg, gcc-4.2-doc-non-dfsg
Severity: serious
Hi,
the debian/copyright of your packages misses the copyright notices
for the portions of the gnat docs copyrighted by AdaCore.
Kind regards
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Ok, I spend another few hours on this problem, it seems this is a
problem with the package management. I reinstalled complete fresh
Debian distribution but just choose a a 2.6.22 Kernel, I rebuild this
kernel here and used 4.2 vor compiling this kernel. Then I installed
the gcc-4.2-multilib also
Here'e the output:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: libgcj8-1
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: serious
I'm getting multiple FTBFS's from Java packages like this one from ecj:
...
dh_perl -pecj-gcj
dh_shlibdeps -pecj-gcj
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for
/usr/lib/gcj-4.2
Package: libgcj8-1
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: serious
I'm getting multiple FTBFS's from Java packages like this one from ecj:
...
dh_perl -pecj-gcj
dh_shlibdeps -pecj-gcj
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for
/usr/lib/gcj-4.2-81/libgcj_bc.so.1 (used by debian/ecj-gcj/usr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 445959 icedove
Bug#445959: icedove - FTBFS: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.2' to `icedove'.
tag 445959 + moreinfo
Bug#445959: icedove - FTBFS: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
Hi,
I have tried the test_param code on powerpc and i386 arch and gcc-4.2 : no
error.
gcc-4.1 on powerpc : error reproduced
xavier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 446470 gnat-4.1
Bug#446470: gnat: Bug when using representation clauses
Bug reassigned from package `gnat' to `gnat-4.1'.
tags 446470 upstream fixed-upstream confirmed
Bug#446470: gnat: Bug when using representation clauses
There were no tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 390101 confirmed
Bug#390101: gnat-4.1: Bug box in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6393
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Tags added: confirmed
retitle [Fixed in 4.2] Bug box in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6393,
when using
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: normal
Tags: confirmed, upstream
In the test case below, GCC emits correct type information for
Debugging.A but the type information for Extenal.B is incorrect.
package External is
type External_Type is array (1 .. 4) of Float;
B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 421790 binutils
Bug#421790: gcc-4.1: Dynamic symbol information missing in stripped libraries
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `binutils'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 421790 binutils
thanks
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:36:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
From the -5 changelog:
* Link using --hash-style=gnu/both.
It seems to only generate a gnu hash now. Looking at the
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:30:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
With 4.1.2-5, the last command results in:
Dynamic symbol information is not available for displaying symbols.
With 4.1.2-4, the last command results in:
Symbol table for image:
Num Buc:Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:36:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
From the -5 changelog:
* Link using --hash-style=gnu/both.
It seems to only generate a gnu hash now. Looking at the difference in
sections between -4 and -5, .hash got replaced by a .gnu.hash section.
I assumed from the
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-5
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
The upgrade of gcc from 4.1.2-4 to 4.1.2-5 is breaking builds of the
installer. The problem seems to be that a stripped library no longer
contains dynamic symbol information.
I've traced this to the following series of commands
does the installer use glibc-2.5?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 22:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
does the installer use glibc-2.5?
Yes, it does for daily builds based on unstable (which is where this BR
occurs). But that has not changed: we were already using 2.5 since before
gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5.
pgpORJqYTmTAx.pgp
Description: PGP
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right spot with a Red Hot Product!
We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the
Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are expecting Record Earnings!
mbwc is currently under
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product!
We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the
Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings!
mbwc
The planet has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product!
We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the
company any moment. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are expecting Record Earnings!
mbwc is
The earth has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right place with a Red Hot Product!
We are looking forward Financial Results to be announced by the
Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are awaiting Record Earnings!
mbwc is currently
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right place in the right time with a Red Hot Product!
We are anticipate Financial Results to be announced by the
Mobile Airwaves any day. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings!
mbwc
The world has gone wireless and Mobile Airwaves (mbwc) is
in the right spot in the right time with a Red Hot Product!
We are awaiting Financial Results to be announced by the
Mobile Airwaves any moment. With all the New Contracts they have
acquired we are waiting for Record Earnings!
mbwc
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:44:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gcc-4.0: GCC 4.0.3 miscompile debugging information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Good evening;
It was brought to your attention that we may be able to help you?
We keep our information confidential, so we cannot say who it was, other than
it was a female who you know.
We have included the link below for you to view:
http://www.clucks.net
Your secret is safe with us
Jennie
administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: gcc
Version: 1.48
Severity: normal
The manpages for c89 and c99 are licensed under the 4 clause bsd license
(ie. advertising license), but this information is not listed in the
copyright file.
Upstream manual pages
I have constructed a minimal test program that reproduces the bug:
Compile with: gcc-4.1 -c -O4 -o test.o test.c
#include complex.h
void testit(double complex* t, double* b)
{
b[0] = t[0]==0.0?0.0:-t[0];
}
main(void)
{
static double complex k = 5;
static double b;
testit(k,b);
}
Hi,
Forgot to tell you that gcc-4.0 works fine on the same file.
Cheers,
//Anders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 1.48
Severity: normal
The manpages for c89 and c99 are licensed under the 4 clause bsd license
(ie. advertising license), but this information is not listed in the
copyright file.
Upstream manual pages don't seem to have changed licensing:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org
to locate and install
non-free documentation seems fully appropriate. The non-availability of
such documentation seems not so much. I hope the current situation is
temporary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Linux kernels compiled with gcc 4.0.3 have invalid debuging information.
More information on this issue and how to verify this error can be
obtained in bug #378621. I'll also have to use gcc 4.0.3 to compile a
kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
debuging information.
More information on this issue and how to verify this error can be
obtained in bug #378621. I'll also have to use gcc 4.0.3 to compile a
kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, CONFIG_KPROBES, and optionally
CONFIG_RELAY. You also need the resulting kernel unstripped vmlinux
By forcing gij to continue by exporting MALLOC_CHECK_=1, I get:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080c1050 ***
(.:17337): Pango-WARNING **: pango_ft2_font_get_face called with bad
font, expect ugly output
malloc: using debugging hooks
java.lang.InternalError: Pango:
Hello
No waiting rooms to increase your chances of getting sick.
Visit The Link Below
igf.smartcapsules.com
lhqushsixu shHeidhRfpVPebRvXJCRzUfZBgQCeP
courtroom's axon baking execute inquisitive determines airs Alabamian fanned
mightn't gadwall balking gerundive applicable attained cloudy
Welcome
We actually stock the drugs.
Click Below
do-med.com
pszrnkvneh jstzflvYAhoRkTkmgyCouiERtlPBjc
execute fits girders flea magicians incident discord baneberry expertly
cooperate ducked intersected McCracken Pollux butter incarnation's crossover
legislates flea chorus adjusters
The property can be controlled, so I supopose the question becomes, what
should be the default value? Sorry I dont know enough, is this a bug or not?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gij-4.1 -Djava.home=/usr GetJVMInfo
java.version= 1.4.2
java.vendor= Free Software Foundation, Inc.
java.home=/usr
[EMAIL
Hi,
term-life-insurers currentlyOffering bestThings:
+Svings up to 7O%
+QuicklyQuote Turnaround
+SmokersApproved!
TakesOnlyMinutes:
http://www.lifequotesgalore.com
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lînger îrgasms - The longest most intense îrgasms of your life
Rock hàrd åråctions - Åråctions like steel
Increased såxuàl desire - Enhàncåd liáido
Åjàculàte like a pîrï stàr - Strîngår åjàculàtiîn (watch where your aiming)
Multiple îrgàsms - Ñum again and again
Up to 500% more volume -
- Cover her in it if you want
Sweeter tasting sperm - Studies show it improves the flavor
Here you will find more information
http://bentley.net.anneal.com.itoservers.com/spur/
__
If you wan't to cancel your subscribition:
http://bolshoi.net.deterring.com.itoservers.com/rm.php?gall2
Hows it been going?
Finally you can get PPV Sports, Movies, Adult Channels,
OnDemand, ect. Best of all, without paying extra for it!
We are offering you these Digital Cable - 54 mhz High
Pass Filters. Check out our website on how well they work!
Our Website : onceaweek.info
This is a true
To: Loren
I was checking my email and saw this advertisement in it. just like you I =
was thinking this stuff will
not work its all a gimmic.. but even with my other half telling me im wast=
ing my money I went ahead
and purchased it. and I can tell you right now with a straight face im big=
Hello,
We sent you an email a while ago, because you now qualify for a new mortgage.
You could get $300,000 for as little as $600 a month!
Bad credit is no problem, you can pull cash out or refinance.
Please click on this link for free consultation by a mortgage broker:
Start Saving Here
Best
tags 270620 -help
tags 270620 -patch
severity 270620 important
clone 270620 -1
retitle 270620 o32 ABI breakage in gcc 3.3/3.4
tags -1 -help
reassign -1 binutils
retitle -1 xgot/multigot breakage
thanks
It turned out that the linker can cope with the current gcc startup
files, so the previous
A p proval Letter
Morgan
Trusted Bank Group
Ref: 18482
Sir:
this letter is to confirm that you have been a.pproved
to ref i nance for a
conventional mor t gage at 3.75% pending completion
of your application.
We have verified that you fit our mor t gage guidelines
to qualify for our low
Etienne Gagnon writes:
The inclusion of libffi gcc in a single .tar.gz that shares scripts,
configure, and Makefiles, does *not* constitutes a mere aggregation.
you are wrong. libffi does have it's own configure and Makefile. For
the scripts you have to show that they are licensed under
Hi Nathanael,
Could you reply to both parts of this message? Thanks.
PART I
==
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
There is really nothing wrong with sharing install-sh friends. Lots
of packages do it.
This is not true. The GNU GPL version 2, section 2 says:
--- BEGIN---
2. You may modify your copy
retitle 195509 RFP: g95 -- GNU Fortran 95
thanks
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:55:27PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Thought this news might be of interest: g95 will be in gcc 3.5.
http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (scroll down to News/July 27)
I don't know whether this means the bug can be
Thank you for your interest in Excelsior Designs furniture. Your request for
additional information will be personally responded to as quickly as possible.
A store that carries the Excelsior collection in the area where you reside will
be provided along with their address and telephone
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 199436 blas
Bug#199436: blas: build failure on sparc
Bug reassigned from package `g77' to `blas'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
