Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:52:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bad syntax error on nested classes' member functions.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
This is not a bug in the compiler, but in your code. Looking at the
declaration
foo_t a::b::frobnicate() {
I notice that the scope of a::b is only reentered at the opening ( of
the method declaration, thus "foo_t" is *not* found to be the
typedef. Instead, it is treated as a plain identifier (o
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Severity: normal
The source below makes G++-3.0 report a syntax error where none exists.
Basically it doesn't wait before giving up on the typename.
// Comment out to make it work.
#define BREAK
struct a {
struct b {
typedef unsigned int foo_t;
foo_
3 matches
Mail list logo
