Bug#105371: gcc-3.0: grammar spelling fixes for README.Debian [patch]

2001-07-16 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:21:17PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above does not pertain to this use. An acronym is still a noun. (And 80s isn't an acroynm, anyway.) It's used as a

Bug#105371: gcc-3.0: grammar spelling fixes for README.Debian [patch]

2001-07-15 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403 Severity: wishlist I suggest these grammar and spelling fixes. Note that it's is always a contraction standing for it is. The possessive form is its. Isn't English great? :-) - Jim Van Zandt --- README.Debian-orig Sun Jul 15

Bug#105371: gcc-3.0: grammar spelling fixes for README.Debian [patch]

2001-07-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:38:42PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: IMO, this is incorrect. The ('s) is always used for showing plural and possesive on things like API's or 80's. It just doesn't make sense without it. Then again, I never cared much for the language part of english class :)

Bug#105371: gcc-3.0: grammar spelling fixes for README.Debian [patch]

2001-07-15 Thread Philip Blundell
No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above does not pertain to this use. An acronym is still a noun. (And 80s isn't an acroynm, anyway.) p. pgpU4M3HJgHOm.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#105371: gcc-3.0: grammar spelling fixes for README.Debian [patch]

2001-07-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:21:17PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: No, we aren't talking about nouns, we are talking about acronyms. The above does not pertain to this use. An acronym is still a noun. (And 80s isn't an acroynm, anyway.) It's used as a noun, but the same rules do not apply,