Bug#114795: gcc-3.0: Weird behaviour with -I/usr/include

2001-10-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 04:44:11PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > > It's documented in the gcc manual that you should not do this. > > Somewhere. I don't immediately see where :( > > I've found it in the node "Interoperation": > >* Use of `-I/usr/include' may cause trouble. > > Many s

Bug#114795: gcc-3.0: Weird behaviour with -I/usr/include

2001-10-08 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 07:05:04PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > > I encountered some very strange behaviour when using > > -I/usr/include. Obviously, it doesn't make much sense to supply > > this switch on the command line, but

Bug#114795: gcc-3.0: Weird behaviour with -I/usr/include

2001-10-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > Package: gcc-3.0 > Version: 1:3.0.1-0pre010811 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > I encountered some very strange behaviour when using -I/usr/include. > Obviously, it doesn't make much sense to supply this switch on the > command

Bug#114795: gcc-3.0: Weird behaviour with -I/usr/include

2001-10-07 Thread Richard Atterer
Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.1-0pre010811 Severity: normal Hello, I encountered some very strange behaviour when using -I/usr/include. Obviously, it doesn't make much sense to supply this switch on the command line, but in any case gcc's reaction is wrong. (I came across this because libwww-c