Your message dated Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:10:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127783: gcc-3.0-source: java selftest fail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2002 15:13:34 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 04 09:13:34 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16MW2H-0001lg-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 09:13:33 -0600 Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 16MW2G-0000XG-0E; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 16:13:32 +0100 Received: from dual ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 16MW2D-1uesT2C; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:13:29 +0100 Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16MW2C-0003cM-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 16:13:28 +0100 From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-3.0-source: java selftest fail X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 16:13:28 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.3-1 Severity: normal The package doesn't pass its selftests and _should_fail_ to build. It should fail when the first make fails and not continue with other selftest, otherwise errors get overlocked. The timeout might be the reason why it fails to build on m68k, something just takes too long during build. MfG Goswin ====================================================================== WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Test Run By mrvn on Fri Jan 4 15:47:05 2002 Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. Using /tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/src/libjava/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. Running /tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/src/libjava/testsuite/libjava.compile/compile.exp ... Running /tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/src/libjava/testsuite/libjava.lang/lang.exp ... XPASS: stub compilation from source XPASS: stub byte compilation XPASS: stub compilation from bytecode XPASS: stub -O compilation from source XPASS: stub byte compilation XPASS: stub -O compilation from bytecode expected was zardoz output was q=0 zardoz XPASS: stringconst output from bytecode->native test expected was zardoz output was q=0 zardoz XPASS: stringconst -O output from bytecode->native test WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: direct_write -O execution from bytecode->native test XPASS: N19990310_4 output from source compiled test expected was OK output was NG XPASS: N19990310_4 -O output from source compiled test expected was OK output was NG Running /tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/src/libjava/testsuite/libjava.mauve/mauve.exp ... === libjava Summary === # of expected passes 1674 # of unexpected failures 1 # of unexpected successes 10 # of expected failures 14 # of untested testcases 17 make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/build/i386-linux/libjava/testsuite' make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[4]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/build/i386-linux/libjava/testsuite' ====================================================================== -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dual 2.4.16 #2 SMP Sun Dec 2 15:35:42 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages gcc-3.0 depends on: ii binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3-4 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii cpp-3.0 1:3.0.3-1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0.3-1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.4-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.0.3-1 GCC support library. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 127783-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2002 02:13:25 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 04 20:13:25 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16MgKq-0002aW-00; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 20:13:24 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA05290; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:10:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g052ALe25556; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:10:21 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:10:20 +0100 To: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#127783: gcc-3.0-source: java selftest fail In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Goswin Brederlow writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Goswin Brederlow writes: > > > Package: gcc-3.0 > > > Version: 1:3.0.3-1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > The package doesn't pass its selftests and _should_fail_ to build. > > > It should fail when the first make fails and not continue with other > > > selftest, otherwise errors get overlocked. > > > > huh? then we'll never have a build which succeeds ... > > Some test are expected to fail, thats fine. I hope the expected > failures don't make the make return with an error too. > > But an unexpected failure suggests a new error. That should fail and > stop the build. fine, if you want this behaviour on m68k, I'll do it. What do we gain? Roman Zippel submitted the patches to build gcj on m68k, so you may want to ask him for the failures. > > you deleted the interesting part. where/why doesn't it continue? > > It does. I think the next one was the gcc tests. That shouldn't be > caried out since the libjava tests failed (unexpectedly). so all is ok. regressions on architecutures, which aren't "supported" upstream in 3.0 (Debian has it's own patches for m68k, hppa and sparc64) are fairly common. Sure, we can just disbale running the testsuite.