I don't think this is related to libstdc++2.10-dev (a dev package not
containing any shared libs).
First significant bug is:
Preparing to replace libstdc++2.10-dev 1:2.95.2-13 (using
.../libstdc++2.10-dev_1%3a2.95.4-1_i386.deb) ...
perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 21:51, Blars Blarson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:39:13PM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
There is no point just trying to pin the blame on arbitrary packages.
The fact that libstdc++2.10-dev won't configure is a symptom of the
problem, not the cause.
I don't
2 matches
Mail list logo
