On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 21:38, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
The GNAT compiler based on GCC 2.8.1 is a top quality compiler. There
are some glitches in the GCC 3.1 port though.
I'm not sure what you mean here; Are you suggesting it might be easier
to fix the bugs in the gcc 2.8.1 based version then in
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
From gcc.gnu.org: please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progress.
Just curious, where does it say that? I looked at
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/, and couldn't find it.
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
From gcc.gnu.org: please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progress.
Just curious, where does it say that? I looked at
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/, and couldn't find it.
It
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
From gcc.gnu.org: please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progress.
Ok. I thought I heard rumors of something like this.
However, the gcc package inherited the gnat package and we currently
don't have a
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
From gcc.gnu.org: please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progress.
Ok. I thought I heard rumors of something like this.
No, we told you this on debian-devel. And it was
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is the upstream address?
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html . Submitting bugs via GNATS
(mind the S ;-) is the preferred method.
--
Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Stuttgart
Brian == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : s-imgrea.adb:236
Brian (which is funny in a way, I don't see where this function is
Brian getting called)
The package System.Img_Real is used to convert floats to string. You
can look at the expanded GNAT output
On 3/06, Brian May wrote:
| However, when I copied the routine to my code, it instantly stopped
| working at all (it turned the Asm call into a NOP), and I half suspected
| at the time that maybe I was doing something wrong (do I need to use a
| special compiler flag or something to get Asm code
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 09:28, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
No. You can check that your assembler has been properly included by
looking at the resulting assembly code (gcc-3.1 -S -o - testbug2.adb).
Curious.
It looks OK, but all it does is copy the input to the output (aux was
created by renaming
Package: gnat-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #148529
The following code is the same as before, except with 2 extra lines:
--- CUT ---
with Ada.Text_IO;
use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ada.Numerics;
use Ada.Numerics;
with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions;
procedure TestBug2 is
Brian May writes:
Is the quality of the Gnat compiler likely to improve any time in the
not-too-distant future, or should I be concentrating my efforts for the
moment at least on other languages?
From gcc.gnu.org: please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progress.
11 matches
Mail list logo
