Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#151182: g++-3.1: struct problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2002 18:37:40 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 27 13:37:40 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (uni-kl.de) [131.246.137.52] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Ne9D-0004yB-00; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:37:39 -0500 Received: from blubb.uni-kl.de (blubb.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.10]) by uni-kl.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5RIbXXl015381; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:37:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by blubb.uni-kl.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5RIbXmW032084; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:37:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (deka [131.246.239.27]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA27071; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:37:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hunger by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Ne8J-0004rr-00; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:36:43 +0200 Subject: g++-3.1: struct problems From: "Tobias Hunger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.42 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:36:42 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Tobias Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-milter (http://amavis.org/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++-3.1 Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre2 Severity: normal Hi! This program is giving me headaches: struct test { char test; }; int main(int argc, char ** argv) { return 0; } ~/test > g++-3.1 -o test test.cc ~/test > g++-2.95 -o test test.cc test.cc:3: ANSI C++ forbids data member `test' with same name as enclosing class Version 2.95 got it right: This is no valid C++ (What happens if someone adds a constructor to the struct?). Regards, Tobias -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux c3po 2.4.18-my-686 #1 Sun Apr 7 20:53:09 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages g++-3.1 depends on: ii gcc-3.1 1:3.1.1-0pre2 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.1-base 1:3.1.1-0pre2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++4-dev 1:3.1.1-0pre2 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 ( -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 151182-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2002 15:18:38 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 27 09:18:38 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18RwFx-0002Ow-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 09:18:37 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24786; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:27 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gBRFFQq00060; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:26 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:26 +0100 To: "Tobias Hunger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#151182: g++-3.1: struct problems In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: As Martin has written, this is a defect in C++ itself. Closing the report.