Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:11:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165777: gcc-3.2: Improper build-dep
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2002 17:48:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 21 12:48:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wv-morgantown1-235.mgtnwv.adelphia.net (silvercoin) 
[24.50.80.235] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 183gfT-0002Bg-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:48:43 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [192.168.0.159])
        by silvercoin (Postfix) with ESMTP id B938C179C9B
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: gcc-3.2: Improper build-dep
From: Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 21 Oct 2002 13:48:38 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0
        tests=SATISFACTION,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: ***



Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source

apt-get build-dep gcc-3.2 
Reading Package Lists... Done Building
Dependency Tree... Done 
E: Build-Depends dependency on gcc-3.2 cannot be satisfied because the 
package libc6.1-dev cannot be found 

I got the above error on my unstable system while trying to grab the 
build dependancies for gcc-3.2


-- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable 
Architecture: i386 
Kernel: Linux GreyGhost 2.4.20-pre8-ac3-shenson2 #1 Tue Oct 8 21:24:40 
EDT 2002 i686 
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gcc-3.2 depends on:
ii  binutils                  2.13.90.0.10-1 The GNU assembler, linker
and bina
ii  cpp-3.2                   1:3.2.1-0pre4  The GNU C preprocessor.
ii  gcc-3.2-base              1:3.2.1-0pre4  The GNU Compiler Collection
(base 
ii  libc6                     2.3.1-2        GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libgcc1                   1:3.2.1-0pre4  GCC support library.

-- no debconf information




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165777-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 00:09:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 21 19:09:40 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gandalf.tausq.org (pippin.tausq.org) [64.81.244.94] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 183mc8-0002dH-00; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:09:40 -0500
Received: by pippin.tausq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 4090ECD83C; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:11:18 -0700
From: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#165777: gcc-3.2: Improper build-dep
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-PGP: for PGP key, see http://www.tausq.org/pgp.txt
X-GPG: for GPG key, see http://www.tausq.org/gpg.txt
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
              USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

> Sorry about the wrong classification.  I am on i386 using unstable.  

ok, yeah, this is an apt-get build-dep bug. it's already been filed
multiple times as 98640 126938 131265 and 145997. 

randolph


Reply via email to