Anthony DeRobertis writes:
> severity 175353 important
> thanks
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> >
> > Why is this filed as a serious bug? It causes harm (at least in theory,
> > if there are people who really share /usr/share with Debian) to have a
> > file in
severity 175353 important
thanks
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
Why is this filed as a serious bug? It causes harm (at least in theory,
if there are people who really share /usr/share with Debian) to have a
file incorrectly in /usr/share; it causes no harm to have a fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 175353 important
Bug#175353: general: *-pic packages violate FHS
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:21:57PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> reopen 175353
> thanks
>
> Many (if not most) libraries have the same ABI on every architecture.
> Examples:
>
> >From gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9:
> cp -p $(srcdir)/libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu \
> $(d_pic)/$(gc
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:21:57PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> reopen 175353
> thanks
>
> Many (if not most) libraries have the same ABI on every architecture.
> Examples:
Why is this filed as a serious bug? It causes harm (at least in theory,
if there are people who really share /usr/shar
reopen 175353
thanks
Many (if not most) libraries have the same ABI on every architecture.
Examples:
>From gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9:
cp -p $(srcdir)/libstdc++-v3/config/linker-map.gnu \
$(d_pic)/$(gcc_lib_dir)/libstdc++_pic.map
(file is created during debian/rules unpack)
6 matches
Mail list logo
