Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicates of 184117
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2003 09:29:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 10 03:29:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host217-39-97-137.in-addr.btopenworld.com (alef0.raz.cx) 
[217.39.97.137] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18sJag-0005Iz-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:29:02 -0600
Received: from raz by alef0.raz.cx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18sJac-0006p9-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:28:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcj-3.2: Borken dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:28:58 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Roland Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcj-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre3
Severity: normal

(N.B. 1:3.2.3-0pre3 is currently installed; trying to upgrade to
current unstable which is 1:3.2.3-0pre4).

$ sudo apt-get install gcj-3.2
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
 
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
 
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  gcj-3.2: Depends: libgcj3-dev (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre4) but 1:3.2.3-0pre3 is to be 
installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
$ sudo apt-get install libgcj3-dev=1:3.2.3-0pre4
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
 
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
 
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgcj3-dev: Depends: LIBC_DEV but it is not installable
E: Sorry, broken packages
$

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux alef0 2.4.20 #1 Thu Feb 20 16:58:25 GMT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gcj-3.2 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.2                    1:3.2.3-0pre4 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-3.2-base               1:3.2.3-0pre4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  java-common                0.16          Base of all Java packages
ii  libc6                      2.3.1-14      GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.2.3-0pre4 GCC support library
ii  libgcj3                    1:3.2.3-0pre4 Java runtime library for use with 
ii  libgcj3-dev                1:3.2.3-0pre3 Java development headers and stati
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.1.4-11    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 01:58:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 19:58:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts5.bellnexxia.net (tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) 
[209.226.175.25] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18svVX-0001kS-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:58:15 -0600
Received: from crystal ([64.229.1.47]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:58:14 -0500
Received: from hsteoh by crystal with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18svXl-0005nT-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Duplicates of 184117
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
From: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

The broken dependency problem has already been fixed in gcj-3.2
1:3.2.3ds4-0pre5 and gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre5, AFAICT. Please reopen if it's
not.


T

-- 
I am not young enough to know everything. -- Oscar Wilde


Reply via email to