On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 20:40:11 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> that disconcerts me, I thought -Wall would include all warnings.
No, it never has and never will. -Wall is probably best described as "all
warnings the gcc developers consider useful under allmost all
circumstances".
Ray
--
"People s
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > Is this roughly what you want:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% gcc-3.2 -Wall -Wconversion -c c.c
> > c.c: In function `main':
> > c.c:8: warning: passing arg 1 of `a
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> Is this roughly what you want:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% gcc-3.2 -Wall -Wconversion -c c.c
> c.c: In function `main':
> c.c:8: warning: passing arg 1 of `a' as unsigned due to prototype
> c.c:8: warning: negative integer implicitl
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:41:20PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
> Severity: wishlist
>
> the following code (compiled with -Wall -pedantic) could be
> considered "buggy", because it implicitly converts a
> signed int to unsigned int when calling "a". if y
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
Severity: wishlist
the following code (compiled with -Wall -pedantic) could be
considered "buggy", because it implicitly converts a
signed int to unsigned int when calling "a". if you run it,
it will print the number 2^32-1 instead of -1.
#include
int a (u
5 matches
Mail list logo
