PROTECTED]
Cc: Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dr. David Alan Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#194242: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#194242:
drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting . and start does not give a
valid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 194242
Bug#194242: gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel
Bug#194196: Can't compile kernel 2.4.20
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 194242 kernel
Bug#194242: gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
The standard says this is undefined behaviour. The code never worked,
but by pure accident produced the expected result.
The compiler is *permitted* to make demons fly out of my nose, but if it
did that, I'd file a bug on it asserting that it shouldn't do that
either.
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
This would have (or at least should
have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility
with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such
tokens. I don't know what the standard says on this issue, but at most
it requires a
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Brian M. Carlson wrote:
This would have (or at least should
have) been caught, because gcc 3.3 introduced a complete incompatibility
with older versions: creating an error when pasting together two such
tokens. I don't know
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 12:11:43PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:03AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
reopen 194242
reassign 194242 gcc
retitle 194242 gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel
merge 194242 194196
thanks, control
Then gcc 3.3
* Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at
least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states:
Which kernel version? On which architecture? With which drivers?
Its fair to say Gcc shouldn't have any bugs that show up in a few
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 07:35:23PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Brian M. Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Indeed they are. The Linux kernel is part of the release criteria (at
least it was for 3.0) [0]. The site states:
Which kernel version? On which architecture? With which
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 01:51:03AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
reopen 194242
reassign 194242 gcc
retitle 194242 gcc: defaulting to 3.3 prevents compilation of the kernel
merge 194242 194196
thanks, control
Then gcc 3.3 should not be the default gcc yet. Reassigning to
gcc.
I disagree.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 194242
Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting . and start does not
give a valid preprocessing token
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 194242 gcc
Bug#194242: drivers/atm/ambassador.c:301:21: pasting . and start does
10 matches
Mail list logo
