Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 09:11, Tom Tromey wrote: Matthias == Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matthias This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway? Could you get more info first? Ideally the reporter could find out exactly what goes wrong. Okay... I'll

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway? Adam C Powell IV writes: Package: gcj-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-3 Severity: normal Hello, Okay, so this is kind of a vague bug at this point, but here's what I know: with gcj-3.2 installed, babel compiles and runs just fine;

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Tromey
Matthias == Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Matthias This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway? Could you get more info first? Ideally the reporter could find out exactly what goes wrong. Tom

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: gcj-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-3 Severity: normal Hello, Okay, so this is kind of a vague bug at this point, but here's what I know: with gcj-3.2 installed, babel compiles and runs just fine; with gcj-3.3, it compiles but fails at runtime using kaffe. Here's the runtime error: /usr/bin/java