On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:13, Bill Allombert wrote:
A wild guess : '@ lr needed for prologue'
mean that lr must not be clobbered but
'ldrb lr, [r0, #3]' clobber it (??)
Yes, exactly that. Thanks for isolating this problem!
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 18:54, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:13, Bill Allombert wrote:
A wild guess : '@ lr needed for prologue'
mean that lr must not be clobbered but
'ldrb lr, [r0, #3]' clobber it
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:13, Bill Allombert wrote:
A wild guess : '@ lr needed for prologue'
mean that lr must not be clobbered but
'ldrb lr, [r0, #3]' clobber it (??)
Yes, exactly that. Thanks for isolating this problem!
I'll take a look at the code and see if I can come up with a fix,
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:26, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3 20030331) worked fine.
With -O2 gcc 3.3 works fine also
The preprocessed
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:27:33AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:26, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:27:33AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 16:26, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
Dear GCC maintainers,
gcc 3.3 (1:3.3ds9-3) miscompile pari (2.1.5) on arm with -O3, whereas
gcc 3.2 (3.2.3 20030331) worked fine.
With -O2 gcc 3.3 works fine also
The preprocessed miscompiled file is available at
7 matches
Mail list logo
