On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:33:10AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Further reading leads me to realise that the .bss-section is supposed to
> be zero-initialized. I've always thought of .bss as a non-initialized
> section (and that's how it's documentented in numerous places).
Any such
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:19:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-3.3: initalizing to zero equals uninitialised
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
2 matches
Mail list logo
