Euh Nor reply ? I did send a reply. Check below transcript
On Monday 27 June 2005 23:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in /usr/lib/gcc-lib, > which was filed against the gcc-3.3 package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > Received: (at 307868-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 21:36:20 +0000 > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 14:36:19 2005 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) > by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) > id 1Dn1H9-0007sr-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:36:19 -0700 > Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] > [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id > XAA12115; > Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:16 +0200 (MEST) > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A3F2B9; > Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:16 +0200 (MEST) > Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP > id 23854-15; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:15 +0200 (MEST) 11352 > Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de > [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; > Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:10 +0200 (MEST) > Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j5RLa9Gu018902; > Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:09 +0200 (MEST) > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:09 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: wim delvaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug#307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in > /usr/lib/gcc-lib In-Reply-To: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER > autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > X-Spam-Level: > > no feedback for 7 weeks. closing the report. > > wim delvaux writes: > > On Friday 06 May 2005 07:04, you wrote: > > > wim delvaux writes: > > > > Package: gcc-3.3 > > > > Version: 1:3.3.6-2 > > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > > > > > > > for tools like makedepend, the current packaging of the gcc compiler > > > > is not ideal. > > > > > > > > lots of files (like stdarg) are in a gcc version specific directory. > > > > for me that is > > > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.6/include/stddef.h > > > > > > > > thie 3.3.6 is annoying since it changes with every (minor) upgrade > > > > of the compiler. > > > > > > > > Hence request to add a link to the package > > > > > > > > ln /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3 > > > > > > > > This way for each minor upgrade, the directory no longer changes > > > > > > you should never include these directories directly. Is there a valid > > > reason to do so? > > > > running makedepend. if I include <stdarg.h> and run makedepend, > > it delivers missing includes, hence the makedepend needs -I ... > > > > W -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
