Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317473: zlib_1:2.2.2-7 (sparc/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find -lgcc_s for 64-bit build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2005 22:17:53 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 08 15:17:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (minbar.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dr1AP-0003AQ-00; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:17:53 -0700 Received: by minbar.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC0E71005C; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: zlib_1:2.2.2-7 (sparc/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find -lgcc_s for 64-bit build X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:17:52 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: zlib Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Since version 1:2.2.2-5, zlib has been failing to build on sparc and s390. The current build failure on sparc is: [...] gcc -m64 -O3 -g -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DNO_vsnprintf -DUSE_MMAP -DHAS_snprintf -DHAS_vsnprintf -o example example.o -L. libz.a /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/libgcc_s.so when searching for -lgcc_s /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/libgcc_s.so when searching for -lgcc_s /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [example] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/zlib-1.2.2/build-tree/zlib-1.2.2' make: *** [debian/stampdir/build-64] Error 2 [...] A full build log can be found at <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=zlib&ver=1%3A1.2.2-7&arch=sparc&stamp=1120745605&file=log&as=raw>. These problems began following packaging changes intended to support biarch on amd64; perhaps something went wrong with that change? It could also be caused by recent toolchain updates, though; it looks like there are a couple of biarch packages that are having build problems on s390 and sparc now, so please reassign to gcc-4.0 if appropriate. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --------------------------------------- Received: (at 317473-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 17:05:35 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 10:05:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DsOCM-0004YD-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:05:34 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA28224; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:31 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A583FC60; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:30 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 16293-49; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200 (MEST) 11359 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6CH5SOw005616; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200 To: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#317473: zlib_1:2.2.2-7 (sparc/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find -lgcc_s for 64-bit build In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Mark Brown writes: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:33:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > get a biarch build of a simple hello world program to build with the > > compilers I found to try: > > > gcc-4.0 -m64 hello.c > > > also complains about not being able to find libgcc. > > Forgot to mention: I also see equivalent trouble with trying to do 32 > bit builds on amd64. both issues fixed in 4.0.1-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]