Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326182: gcc-4.0: It's about time Debian adds gcc-config, 
or update-alternatives --config gcc alternatives!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 08:57:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 01:57:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hdr.unk.fi [212.182.195.248] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EB7MI-0000Id-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:57:15 -0700
Received: by hdr.unk.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 6CA2915A14; Fri,  2 Sep 2005 11:57:12 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-4.0: It's about time Debian adds gcc-config,
 or update-alternatives --config gcc alternatives!
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 11:57:12 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-6
Severity: wishlist


It's about time Debian adds gcc-config -like script or make decent
/etc/alternatives for gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4, gcc-4.0. Playing with environment
variables just isn't same!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc7
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.16.1-3   The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.0                       4.0.1-6    The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.0-base                  4.0.1-6    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.0 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev                     2.3.5-6    GNU C Library: Development Librari
pn  libmudflap0-dev               <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326182-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 10:30:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 03:30:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EB8od-00014R-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 03:30:36 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18282;
        Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:30:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6EEFD4A;
        Fri,  2 Sep 2005 12:30:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 27042-30; Fri,  2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200 (MEST) 11269
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
        Fri,  2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82AUSrw023943;
        Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:30:28 +0200
To: Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#326182: gcc-4.0: It's about time Debian adds gcc-config, or 
update-alternatives --config gcc alternatives!
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Samuli Suominen writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.1-6
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> 
> It's about time Debian adds gcc-config -like script or make decent
> /etc/alternatives for gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4, gcc-4.0. Playing with environment
> variables just isn't same!

No, please read README.Debian in the gcc package.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to