Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-04 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: +! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = n32 32 64 +! MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 32 . 64 Why bother? Stuff in rules.d (binary-libstdcxx.mk) assume that $biarch means put it in a subdir name 64, and that $biarch32 means put it in a subdir named 32. : # remove

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please enable tri-arch support for the MIPS platforms. The attached patch (and a corresponding patch to glibc) provide support for n32 n64 ABIs in addition to the current o32 ABI. These patches have been tested by building n32

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Stuart Anderson writes: Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please enable tri-arch support for the MIPS platforms. The attached patch (and a corresponding patch to glibc) provide support for n32 n64 ABIs in addition to the current o32 ABI. These patches

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:31:23PM -0700, Stuart Anderson wrote: +# DP: Description: add full tri-arch support. Include linux64.h also fix up +# DP: Description: the directory names so that o32 is the default and follow +# DP: Description: the glibc convention for 32 64 bit names Everyone

Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Stuart Anderson
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on a specific patch level of yet another

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have to dig into that package and create a dependency on a specific

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:51:32AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug, but I was trying to not have

Re: Bug#341882: gcc-4.0: [mips] support for tri-arch on mips mipsel

2005-12-03 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:51:32AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Stuart Anderson wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: ar and ld get confused if they are not set. For some reason, it can't decide which binary format to use. It may be a binutils bug,