tags 356316 +patch
thanks
This turned out to be pretty trivial to fix, though it then took
something like 5 hours to rebuild gcc and test it!
--- gcc/cp/class.c~ 2006-03-11 13:28:45.0 +
+++ gcc/cp/class.c 2006-03-11 13:30:19.0 +
@@ -5073,9 +5073,7 @@
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-10
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
It's generally a design error to have a public non-virtual destructor
in a class that has virtual functions, so I accept that g++ should
warn about that. However, a protected non-virtual destructor is
normally fine, because it
2 matches
Mail list logo