Hector Oron writes:
> Hello Arthur,
>
> > Why do we need cross-compilers between biarched archs ? ``gcc -m32'' on
> > amd64
> > and ``gcc -m64'' on i386 are fine. Also, please rebase your patch on
> > current SVN.
>
> It looked like somebody was using those kind of compilers
> https://bugs.laun
> maybe you just want to use $(biarch_cpu)-$(DEB_TARGET_GNU_SYSTEM)
> instead of having a conditional for every architecture?
Up to you.. i'm afraid of breaking stuff, those patches are already tested.
--
Héctor Orón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Hello Arthur,
> Why do we need cross-compilers between biarched archs ? ``gcc -m32'' on amd64
> and ``gcc -m64'' on i386 are fine. Also, please rebase your patch on current
> SVN.
It looked like somebody was using those kind of compilers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/121
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:19:41PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch also fixes amd64->i486, plus it includes the above patch for
> powerpc.
>
> Cheers
Why do we need cross-compilers between biarched archs ? ``gcc -m32'' on amd64
and ``gcc -m64'' on i386 are fine. Also, please r
Hello,
This patch also fixes amd64->i486, plus it includes the above patch for powerpc.
Cheers
--
Héctor Orón
diff -urN gcc-4.2-4.2.4/debian/rules.d/binary-libstdcxx-cross.mk gcc-4.2-4.2.4.cross/debian/rules.d/binary-libstdcxx-cross.mk
--- gcc-4.2-4.2.4/debian/rules.d/binary-libstdcxx-cross.mk
5 matches
Mail list logo