On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1
containing only libgcc_s.so.1.
In case we do decide on inclusion in gcc, here is an updated patch for 4.4
and the additional patch for 4.5.
Changes:
- added libgcc[246] udebs for
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
I'm still not convinced that the (IMO minor) disadvantages of having a udeb
in gcc are sufficient to treat gcc different from all other packages that
provide udebs.
With britney support it won't change anything for
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 27.01.2010 23:26, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source
package, build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that.
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based) graphical
installer because of
On 27.01.2010 21:03, Frans Pop wrote:
Source: gcc-4.4
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider the attached patch which adds a udeb for libgcc1 containing
only libgcc_s.so.1. That file is needed for the (directfb based)
Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
The patch itself looks ok, some other questions:
- did you consider building the udeb from a separate source package,
build-depending on gcc-4.4-source?
No, I had not considered that. It's an option
7 matches
Mail list logo
