Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:43:10 +0000 with message-id <e1ase8c-0005cb...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#821336: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #733975, regarding gcc-4.8: -Os optimization bug (address of label) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 733975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gcc-4.8 Version: 4.8.2-11 Severity: normal Attached is a small C program. It just takes the address of a label, and subtracts the address of the function, to get the "size". The problem is not directly related with that, though - the printf() output is wrong. When compiled with "-g -Wall" the output is as expected: $1 = 0x40 Continuing. 64 But with "-g -Wall -Os" I get $1 = 0x22 Continuing. -317 so the information returned from the function is ok (gets smaller with -Os), but the value used for printf() is wrong. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gcc-4.8 depends on: ii binutils 2.24-2 ii cpp-4.8 4.8.2-11 ii gcc-4.8-base 4.8.2-11 ii libc6 2.17-97 ii libcloog-isl4 0.18.1-3 ii libgcc-4.8-dev 4.8.2-11 ii libgmp10 2:5.1.3+dfsg-1 ii libisl10 0.12.1-2 ii libmpc3 1.0.1-1 ii libmpfr4 3.1.2-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Versions of packages gcc-4.8 recommends: ii libc6-dev 2.17-97 Versions of packages gcc-4.8 suggests: ii binutils [binutils-gold] 2.24-2 ii gcc-4.8-doc 4.8.2-2 pn gcc-4.8-locales <none> ii gcc-4.8-multilib 4.8.2-11 pn libasan0-dbg <none> pn libatomic1-dbg <none> pn libbacktrace1-dbg <none> pn libgcc1-dbg <none> pn libgomp1-dbg <none> pn libitm1-dbg <none> pn libquadmath0-dbg <none> pn libtsan0-dbg <none>#include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> int f(int a) { int i; if (!a) return (long)&&j - (long)f; for(i=0; i<100; i++) if (i * i < a) break; j: return i; } int main(void) { { char stg[256]; sprintf(stg, "gdb -q -p %d -ex 'print f(0)' -ex c &", getpid()); system(stg); } sleep(2); printf("%d\n", f(0)); return f(1); }
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 4.8.5-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-4.8 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/821336 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
