Matthias Klose, le Sun 31 Aug 2014 18:39:21 +0200, a écrit :
> Am 31.08.2014 um 03:10 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > guess that will just fix all our issues... I'll then commit that and
> > push upstream.
>
> is this necessary for the libgc package too? (and all embedded libgc copies in
> other pac
Am 31.08.2014 um 03:10 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> guess that will just fix all our issues... I'll then commit that and
> push upstream.
is this necessary for the libgc package too? (and all embedded libgc copies in
other packages)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.or
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libc0.3
There was also another issue, which was basically making boehm-gc
completely ignore pointers on the main stack. This was in libc0.3, thus
cloning & reassigning.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Hello,
I've dug a bit more the java failures we've been encountering for some
time. The particular case of simply running gjdoc was helpful: an
object gets allocated, then other happens, then the object gets used,
but its method table is completely nuts. It happens that the class
field of the ob
4 matches
Mail list logo
