Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Ron" == Ron writes: Ron> I'd be kind of sad if that stopped being possible again for the Ron> final released version of Jessie, and we had to skip yet Ron> another release before being able to do this on Debian again. Ron> It may not be the best and final answer, but it h

Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-21 Thread Ron
Helmut wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the > > code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to > > be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Don, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the > code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to > be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of > bring-up

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I have to admit that the code is not exactly lightweight. I do > understand the desire to get rid it and asked that a ctte ruling does > not apply beyond jessie for that reason. Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the code wh

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-03 Thread Wookey
+++ Helmut Grohne [2014-11-01 10:38 +0100]: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:46:48AM +, Wookey wrote: > > To me that sounds like this method is actually the > > current de-facto default in Debian - it is certainly at least on a par. > > I don't think that a feature being de-facto default is a goo

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-01 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:46:48AM +, Wookey wrote: > To me that sounds like this method is actually the > current de-facto default in Debian - it is certainly at least on a par. I don't think that a feature being de-facto default is a good argument to force maintaining it forever. There clea

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-10-31 Thread Wookey
+++ Helmut Grohne [2014-10-28 07:13 +0100]: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:41:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770 > > > It is about a bug in the implementation of with_deps_on_target_arch (the > > > contended feature). > > > > I think

Re: Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-10-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:41:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770 > > It is about a bug in the implementation of with_deps_on_target_arch (the > > contended feature). > > I think I may not understand what's going on here. In your mail

Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-10-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Helmut Grohne writes ("Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building"): > Since it is my interest to not cause more work on Matthias, I will try > to summarize his POV. Thanks. > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770 > It