> "Ron" == Ron writes:
Ron> I'd be kind of sad if that stopped being possible again for the
Ron> final released version of Jessie, and we had to skip yet
Ron> another release before being able to do this on Debian again.
Ron> It may not be the best and final answer, but it h
Helmut wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
> > code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to
> > be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage
Hi Don,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:41:49PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
> code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to
> be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of
> bring-up
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I have to admit that the code is not exactly lightweight. I do
> understand the desire to get rid it and asked that a ctte ruling does
> not apply beyond jessie for that reason.
Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the
code wh
+++ Helmut Grohne [2014-11-01 10:38 +0100]:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:46:48AM +, Wookey wrote:
> > To me that sounds like this method is actually the
> > current de-facto default in Debian - it is certainly at least on a par.
>
> I don't think that a feature being de-facto default is a goo
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:46:48AM +, Wookey wrote:
> To me that sounds like this method is actually the
> current de-facto default in Debian - it is certainly at least on a par.
I don't think that a feature being de-facto default is a good argument
to force maintaining it forever. There clea
+++ Helmut Grohne [2014-10-28 07:13 +0100]:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:41:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770
> > > It is about a bug in the implementation of with_deps_on_target_arch (the
> > > contended feature).
> >
> > I think
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:41:59PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770
> > It is about a bug in the implementation of with_deps_on_target_arch (the
> > contended feature).
>
> I think I may not understand what's going on here. In your mail
Helmut Grohne writes ("Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch
cross building"):
> Since it is my interest to not cause more work on Matthias, I will try
> to summarize his POV.
Thanks.
> The most obvious bug is the one mentioned in the patch: #760770
> It
9 matches
Mail list logo
