Re: Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-22 Thread Eric Valette
I'm exploring possible options like patching (upstream) GCC to disable PIE for kernel or patching (upstream) kernel to disable PIE when it can be disabled. AFAIK the linux package is the only problematic package were the maintainer refused to disable PIE from packaging scripts. And I shre with

Bug#835148: Bug#837420: Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 10/22/2016 01:00 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Bálint Réczey dixit: > >> AFAIK the linux package is the only problematic package were the >> maintainer refused to disable PIE from packaging scripts. > > So, how are you supposed to do that now, instead of filtering > -fPIE from CFLAGS and -pie

Bug#835148: Bug#837420: Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-10-22 1:00 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser : > Bálint Réczey dixit: > >>AFAIK the linux package is the only problematic package were the >>maintainer refused to disable PIE from packaging scripts. > > So, how are you supposed to do that now, instead of filtering > -fPIE from

Bug#835148: Bug#837420: Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bálint Réczey dixit: >AFAIK the linux package is the only problematic package were the >maintainer refused to disable PIE from packaging scripts. So, how are you supposed to do that now, instead of filtering -fPIE from CFLAGS and -pie from LDFLAGS? Christian/zumbi: do you take care of dietlibc,

Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Thorsten 2016-10-21 19:11 GMT+02:00 Thorsten Glaser : > Adrian Bunk dixit: > >>gcc-6 6.2.0-7 uploaded to unstable on Tue 18 Oct 2016 defaults to PIE, >>see #835148 for details. > > Oh, thanks. > > This is *so* *totally* the wrong approach, especially as we > have

Bug#835148: please do not make GCC incompatible, we have dpkg-buildflags for this! (was Re: Bug#837420: Processed: PIE FTBFS are now RC)

2016-10-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adrian Bunk dixit: >gcc-6 6.2.0-7 uploaded to unstable on Tue 18 Oct 2016 defaults to PIE, >see #835148 for details. Oh, thanks. This is *so* *totally* the wrong approach, especially as we have dpkg-buildflags, which was introduced *precisely* for this purpose, and to make Debian’s GCC not