Your message dated Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#90355: Upstream changelog missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2001 23:04:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 17:04:41 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (localhost) [12.44.140.127]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14f8hd-0003Jm-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:41 -0600
Received: from gbsadler by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14f8hb-0008LB-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:39 -0600
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:04:39 -0600
From: Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Upstream changelog missing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
Sender: Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.3-8
Severity: normal
I checked {cpp,gcc}, {cpp,gcc}-2.95, and {cpp,gcc}-2.95-doc. Can't find any
trace of
upstream changelogs. I checked libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 and
libstdc++2.10-dev as well.
Gordon Sadler
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux home-desktop 2.4.2-ac1 #3 Mon Feb 26 04:50:16 CST 2001 i686
Versions of packages gcc-2.95 depends on:
ii binutils 2.11.90.0.1-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.3-8 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc 1:2.95.3-5 The GNU C compiler.
ii libc6 2.2.2-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 90355-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 11:14:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 06:14:52 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jfoq-00046Z-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 06:14:52 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22633;
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA21762;
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:12:17 +0200 (MEST)
To: Gordon Sadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#90355: Upstream changelog missing
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gordon Sadler writes:
> > I tend to close the report without including the upstream
> > changelogs. Other votes?
> >
> I can agree with this. I was not thinking of the repercussions, just
> seemed odd that it was missing.
>
> Maybe a modified/cut-down changelog could be shipped? With a note in
> README.Debian that it is a partial log, the full log is available via
> apt-get source.
I added the comment to the README.Debian.
