Bug#954681: [gnat-9] crash caused by SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch

2020-07-08 Thread Torrance, Douglas
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:37:23 +0200 Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Commit 2e5e37249f09e54bb62e3ab87508e43ff709a4fb should improve the > situation. > It reverts the part affecting s-os_lib.adb. A GCC build produces the > same checksum for it than 9.3.0-8 in libgnat-9, hopefully making gnat > usable

Bug#954681: [gnat-9] crash caused by SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch

2020-04-04 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Hello. Commit 2e5e37249f09e54bb62e3ab87508e43ff709a4fb should improve the situation. It reverts the part affecting s-os_lib.adb. A GCC build produces the same checksum for it than 9.3.0-8 in libgnat-9, hopefully making gnat usable again by existing packaged libraries (I don't know how to test

Bug#954681: [gnat-9] crash caused by SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch

2020-04-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 4/3/20 9:47 PM, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Package: src:gcc-9 > Followup-For: Bug #954681 > Control: reopen -1 > > Hello. > > The initial symptom is cured, but the fix lets > debian/patches/ada-lib-info-source-date-epoch.diff modify > gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.ad[bs]. > > This invalidates

Bug#954681: [gnat-9] crash caused by SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch

2020-04-03 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: src:gcc-9 Followup-For: Bug #954681 Control: reopen -1 Hello. The initial symptom is cured, but the fix lets debian/patches/ada-lib-info-source-date-epoch.diff modify gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.ad[bs]. This invalidates the checksums embedded in the .ali files of libgnat-9, causing a