Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-24 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 97030 normal retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation thanks severity lowered: - works ok with -O1 - works ok with 3.0 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS writes: > I tried this with gcc-2_95-branch and gcc-3_0-branch from CVS today. > The latest gcc-2.95 has the same problem, but the

Processed: Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 97030 normal Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 97030 [fixed in gcc-3.0] wrong code generation Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopp

Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-16 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
I tried this with gcc-2_95-branch and gcc-3_0-branch from CVS today. The latest gcc-2.95 has the same problem, but the latest gcc-3.0 doesn't. I expect gcc-3.0 will be out well before woody, but I don't know whether that means you might use gcc-3.0 for building woody ... Edmund

Bug#97030: gcc: seems to generate incorrect code

2001-05-10 Thread edmundo
Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.3-7 Severity: important Maybe I've been working too hard, but this gcc seems to get this wrong with -O2: void gunc(unsigned a, unsigned b) { } unsigned func(unsigned a, unsigned b) { long long x = 0; gunc(a, b); return (x + 1) * a * b; } int main() { unsign