Bug#128993: marked as done ([PR9073, fixed in 3.4] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?)

2005-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Jan 2002 04:45:43 -0500 Received: from anthony by localhost with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16PhCu-0004Ni-00; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 04:45:43 -0500 From: Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libstdc++3: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back

Processed: Re: Bug#128993: [Bug libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2004-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 128993 + fixed-upstream Bug#128993: [PR libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream retitle 128993 [PR9073, fixed in 3.4] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more

Bug#128993: [Bug libstdc++/9073] Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2003-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-21 20:26 --- This is fixed by the debug mode for libstdc++v3. -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#128993: libstdc++/9073: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2003-01-02 Thread bkoz
Synopsis: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned-bkoz Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 15:07:37 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: bkoz State

Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2002-12-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Submitter-Id: net Originator:Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: The Debian Project Confidential: no Synopsis: Severity: non-critical Priority: low Category: libstdc++ Class: change-request Release: 3.0.4 (Debian) (Debian unstable)

Bug#128993: libstdc++/9073: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2002-12-27 Thread gcc-gnats
Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `libstdc++/9073'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. Category: libstdc++ Responsible:unassigned Synopsis: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? Arrival

Bug#128993: libstdc++3: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope?

2002-01-13 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: libstdc++3 Version: 1:3.0.3-1 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It'd be nice to have __STL_ASSERTIONS or equivelant come back to do things like bounds-check vector accesses (yes, I know about at()) for debugging purposes. - -- System Information Debian