On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 12:16, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> Since I do not have the original sources/patch etc. I am unable to verify
> (well I might go searching for it on the net, but I'm lazy).
>
> But I have been building pine*.deb packages for a long time now
> every time a new pine came out so I gu
On 21 Mar 2002, Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:21, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be
> > closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm
> > and close it?
>
> Does the problem still exist with
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:21, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be
> closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm
> and close it?
Does the problem still exist with the latest gcc-2.95 package? It's not
clear to me
I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be
closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm
and close it?
*t
---
Tomas Pospisek
sourcepole- Linux & Open Source Solu
4 matches
Mail list logo
