Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose writes: peter green writes: Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable. That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those

Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Ludovic Brenta writes: Matthias Klose writes: peter green writes: Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.

Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Peter Green
So? Does that mean the bug doesn't affect GCC 4.1? In that case, I believe Peter is correct that the bug must be resolved before GCC 4.2 can enter unstable. Do you agree? That wasn't text i wrote it was text i was quoting. I was just asking if anyone knew if there was a bug report on the issue

FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-18 Thread peter green
Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable. That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those symbols are for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++

Re: FW: RE gcc plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-18 Thread Matthias Klose
peter green writes: Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable. That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those symbols are for glibc. Why