Matthias Klose writes:
peter green writes:
Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those
Ludovic Brenta writes:
Matthias Klose writes:
peter green writes:
Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
So? Does that mean the bug doesn't affect GCC 4.1? In that case, I
believe Peter is correct that the bug must be resolved before GCC 4.2
can enter unstable. Do you agree?
That wasn't text i wrote it was text i was quoting.
I was just asking if anyone knew if there was a bug report on the issue
Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those symbols are
for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++
peter green writes:
Next GCC 4.2 will be prepared to be included in unstable; a current
issue is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 which has
to be resolved before g++-4.2 can enter unstable.
That bug is marked as resolved invalid with a reply Those symbols are
for glibc. Why
5 matches
Mail list logo